1Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Nutrition and Foodswervice Management, Paichai University, Daejeon, Korea.
Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The general characteristics of the respondents
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) N (%)
The dietary practice of Chinese female marriage immigrants in Korea
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) N (%)
3) Community / Internet
4) Price / Korean-style
The dietary acculturation level of Chinese female marriage immigrants in Korea
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
3) Mean ± SD
The perception on Korean food of Chinese female marriage immigrants in Korea
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
3) Mean ± SD
The healthy dietary behavior of Chinese female marriage immigrants in Korea
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
3) Mean ± SD
4) Reverse coding
Chinese female marriage immigrants' changes in dietary habits after immigration to Korea
1) p-value by chi-square test
2) N (%)
3) 33% of the cells had expected counts of less than 5. Therefore "no change" and "decrease" response categories were combined into a single category for chi-square test.
Chinese female marriage immigrants' change in food intake after immigration to Korea
1) 2) N (%)
1) 2) N (%) 3) Community / Internet 4) Price / Korean-style
1) 2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree 3) Mean ± SD
1) 2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree 3) Mean ± SD
1) 2) 5 point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree 3) Mean ± SD 4) Reverse coding
1) 2) N (%) 3) 33% of the cells had expected counts of less than 5. Therefore "no change" and "decrease" response categories were combined into a single category for chi-square test.