1Nutrition Education Major, Graduate School of Education, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
3Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Copyright © 2011 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
1) Total numbers of respondence among subjects
2) Mean ± SD
3) a,b For a given column, data not sharing a common superscript letter are statistically significantly different at P < 0.05
4) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree
5) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
General Characteristics of the subjects
Dietary behaviors of students
1) N (%), 2) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.001
Nutrition knowledge, school life, and dietary behaviors related to MMS by frequency of breakfast (n = 396)1)
1) Total numbers of respondence among subjects
2) Mean ± SD
3) a,b For a given column, data not sharing a common superscript letter are statistically significantly different at P < 0.05
4) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree
5) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
Dietary behavior related to MMS by gender
1) Mean ± SD
2) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree
3) *: p < 0.05
MMS menu preferred by students
1) N (%)
Perception and satisfaction of mothers and teachers in relation to MMS
1) Mean ± SD
2) a,b For a given column, data not sharing a common superscript letter are statistically significantly different at p < 0.05
3) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree
4) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
Mother's perception toward MMS in relation to children's school life and dietary behaviors by mother's working status
1) Mean ± SD
2) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree
3) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
Comparison of opinion on light lunch menu with MMS between mothers and teachers
1) N (%)
2) ***: p < 0.001
1) N (%), 2) *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.001
1) Total numbers of respondence among subjects 2) Mean ± SD 3) a,b For a given column, data not sharing a common superscript letter are statistically significantly different at 4) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree 5) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD 2) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree 3) *: p < 0.05
1) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD 2) a,b For a given column, data not sharing a common superscript letter are statistically significantly different at 3) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree 4) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD 2) Scale of 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree 3) *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001
1) N (%) 2) ***: p < 0.001