Institute on Aging Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
1Nutrition Policy Team, Department of Health Industry & Policy, Korea Heallth Industry Development Institute, Osong, Korea.
2Lee Gil Ya Cancer and Diabetes Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.
Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Community Nutrition
This work was supported by Seoul city government grant (2009) and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (2009-0093587)
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun (Lee 2009)
3) male (n) / female (n), 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Mean for males/females
*: significantly different between gender at p < 0.05
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun (Lee 2009)
3) male (n) / female (n), 4) mean for males/females, 5) Mean ± SD
**: Significantly different between gender at p < 0.01
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) male (n) / female (n), 3) under 75% EER, 4) N (%), 5) mean for males/females, 6) Mean ± SD
General characteristics of subjects
1) Mean ± SD, 2) range (min-max), 3) N (%)
Physical measurement
1) Mean ± SD, 2) range (min-max), ns: not significant
Health status and life style
1) N (%), 2) Mean ± SD, 3) range (min-max), ns: not significant
Dietary behavior
1) N (%), 2) Mean ± SD, 3) range (min-max), ns: not significant
Average daily food intake (g/day)
1) Mean ± SD (%)
The average daily nutrient intake of subjects
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun (Lee 2009)
3) male (n) / female (n), 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Mean for males/females
*: significantly different between gender at p < 0.05
Percent EER and RI of nutrient intake of subjects
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun (Lee 2009)
3) male (n) / female (n), 4) mean for males/females, 5) Mean ± SD
**: Significantly different between gender at p < 0.01
Prevalence of nutrient intake under EAR
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 (KCDCP 2011)
2) male (n) / female (n), 3) under 75% EER, 4) N (%), 5) mean for males/females, 6) Mean ± SD
Index of Nutrient Quality (INQ) and Man Adequacy Ratio (MAR)
1) Mean ± SD, 2) N (%), ns: not significant
Significantly different between gender at *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 or ***: p < 0.001
Food intake diversity and meal balance
1) Mean ± SD, ns: not significant
Mini-Nutrition Assessment (MNA) of subjects
1) Mean ± SD, 2) N (%), ns: not significant
significantly different between gender at p < 0.05* or p < 0.001***
Nutrient intake and dietary factors according to nutritional status assessed by MNA
1) Mean ± SD, 2) means without common alphabet are significantly different each other within a same gender.
3) nEAR: number of nutrient under EAR, 4) nINQ < 1: number of nutrient with INQ < 1
1) Mean ± SD, 2) range (min-max), 3) N (%)
1) Mean ± SD, 2) range (min-max), ns: not significant
1) N (%), 2) Mean ± SD, 3) range (min-max), ns: not significant
1) N (%), 2) Mean ± SD, 3) range (min-max), ns: not significant
1) Mean ± SD (%)
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 ( 2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun ( 3) male (n) / female (n), 4) Mean ± SD, 5) Mean for males/females *: significantly different between gender at p < 0.05
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 ( 2) Study on nutritional status of elderly aged 85 and more living in Soonchang-gun ( 3) male (n) / female (n), 4) mean for males/females, 5) Mean ± SD **: Significantly different between gender at p < 0.01
1) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2010 ( 2) male (n) / female (n), 3) under 75% EER, 4) N (%), 5) mean for males/females, 6) Mean ± SD
1) Mean ± SD, 2) N (%), ns: not significant Significantly different between gender at *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 or ***: p < 0.001
1) Mean ± SD, ns: not significant
1) Mean ± SD, 2) N (%), ns: not significant significantly different between gender at p < 0.05* or p < 0.001***
1) Mean ± SD, 2) means without common alphabet are significantly different each other within a same gender. 3) nEAR: number of nutrient under EAR, 4) nINQ < 1: number of nutrient with INQ < 1