A-Rom Kim; Mi-Jeong Kim; Youngnam Kim

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2011.16.3.375

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 16(3); 2011 > Article

Original Article
Nutritional Assessment of Menu Plan Prepared according to the Target Pattern: Menu Prepared by Home Economics Teachers and Middle-School Girls: A-Rom Kim, Mi-Jeong Kim, Youngnam Kim; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2011;16(3):375-385.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2011.16.3.375
Published online: June 30, 2011

Home Economics Education, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.

¹Sinmuk Primary School, Seoul, Korea.

²Department of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.

Corresponding author: Youngnam Kim, Department of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education, 363-791 Darak-ri, Gangnae-myeon, Chungwon-gun, Chungbuk, Korea. Tel: (043) 230-3709, Fax: (043) 231-4087, youngnam@knue.ac.kr

• Received: February 14, 2011 • Revised: April 8, 2011 • Accepted: June 2, 2011

369 Views
2 Download
6 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The nutritional balance of the menu plans prepared according to the target pattern was examined. Total of 81 home economics teachers throughout the nation and 161 3rd-grade middle-school girls in Chungnam area participated. The data was collected by questionnaire and analyzed by using SPSS WIN 12.0. Although both teacher and student groups had fairly good knowledge on preparing menu plans related concepts, they rarely make use any menu planning currently. More than 85% of menu plans investigated exceeded their energy goal in the target pattern. The energy contribution ratios of carbohydrate: protein: fat were 56.1%: 17.4%: 26.5% in teachers' menu plan and 55.1%: 17.2%: 27.7% in students' menu plan. The NAR of the protein, phosphorous, iron, zinc, vitamin A and C, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B₆ was 1 or near 1. But in case of calcium, 56.5% of the menu plan prepared by the students was less than 1, and in case of folate 75.3% of teachers', and 85.1% of students' were less than NAR 1. The MAR of the 12 nutrients examined were 0.98, 0.97, and the DVS were 51, 49 for menu plan prepared by teachers and students, respectively.
Keywords: target pattern; menu plan; nutrient adequacy ratio; mean adequacy ratio; dietary variety score

REFERENCES

1. Bae YJ, Lee JC, Kim MH. Nutritional status and dietary quality of college students by residing types in Samcheok. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2007; 13(4): 311-330.
2. Choi J, Chung YJ. Evaluation of diet quality according to food consumption between highly educated, married, unemployed and employed women. Korean J Nutr. 2006; 39(3): 274-285.
3. Choi MK, Kim HS, Kee WY, Lee H, Ze KR, Park JD. Comparative evaluation of dietary intakes of calcium, phosphorous, iron, and zinc in rural, coastal, and urban district. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2005; 34(5): 659-666.
4. Jang HS. The assessment of diet quality according to exercise practices of middle school students. Korean J Exerc Nutr. 2004; 8(3): 295-301.
5. Jang HS, Hwang IJ. Nutrient intakes and physical activity self-efficacy of high-rade elementary school students according to obesity index. J Korean Home Econ Educ Assoc. 2006; 18(4): 67-84.
6. Jang HS, Lee SY. The body composition and the nutrient intakes of the physical-education high school male athletics and high school mate students. J Korean Home Econ Educ Assoc. 2006; 18(4): 207-216.
7. Jung SB, Lee SB, Lee JS, Lee CJ, Lee HS, Na HJ, Mo TW, Chun HJ. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002; Seoul: Gyohaksa; 61-84.
8. Kang KJ. A study on food habits, nutrient intakes and nutritional quality of preschool children in Seoul. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005; 10(4): 471-483.
9. Kim BR, Cho YE. A study on the evaluation of nutrient intake of middle school students in Kangneung. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2001; 30(4): 739-746.
10. Kim BR, Kim YM. A study on the food habits and the evaluation of nutrient intakes of high school students in Chuncheon. J Korean Home Econ Educ Assoc. 2005; 17(3): 35-52.
11. Kim JY, Moon SJ. An Ecological analysis of the relationship between diet diversity and nutrient intake. Korean J Nutr. 1990; 23(5): 309-316.
12. Kim MH, Bae YJ, Lee DH, Cho HK, Choi SH, Sung CJ. A evaluation study on nutrient intake status and diet quality of middle and old aged vegetarian women in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005; 10(6): 869-879.
13. Kim MH, Bae YJ, Sung CJ. A evaluation study on nutrient intake and diet quality of male college students according to packyear in Korea. Korean J Nutr. 2006a; 39(6): 572-584.
14. Kim MH, Lee JC, Bae YJ. The evaluation study on eating behavior and dietary quality of elderly people residing in Samchuck according to age group. Korean J Community Nutr. 2009; 14(5): 495-508.
15. Kim MH, Lee JC, Bae YJ, Cho HK, Kim MH, Kim EY, Hing WJ, Sung CJ. Nutritional status and diet quality of female college students by living together with or without parents. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2006b; 16(6): 635-645.
16. Kim MH, Lee JC, Bae YJ. The evaluation study on eating behavior and dietary quality of elderly people residing in Samcheok according to age group. Korean J Community Nutr. 2009; 14(5): 495-508.
17. Kim PW, Kim GS, Kim JM, Kang SM, Lee KG, You HS, Chang MS, Hwang HY, Lee NS. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002; Seoul: Gyohaksa; 15-21.
18. Kwak KS, Bae YJ, Kim MH. Nutritional status and dietary quality in the low-income elderly residing at home or in health care facilities. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2008; 14(4): 337-350.
19. Kwon JY, Park H, Whang EM. The assessment of dietary quality in toddler of 12-36 months. Korean J Nutr. 2001; 34(2): 176-187.
20. Lee BG, Kwon YC, Song GD, Ryeu GH, Han SS, Choi MS, Han MC. Middle school technology·home Economics. 2002; Seoul: Geumsungchulpansa; 14-19.
21. Lee MS, Kwak CS. The comparison in daily intake of nutrients, quality of diets and dietary hablits between male and female college students in Daejeon. Korean J Community Nutr. 2006; 11(1): 39-51.
22. Lee SH, Chang N. Effectiveness of nutrition education on dietary habits and diet quality in the weight loss and weight gain groups in college women. Korean J Nutr. 2007; 40(5): 463-474.
23. Lee SH, Lee YS, Kim JS, Seung C, Lee GH, Lim GH, Lee KY, Lee EY, Kim DN, Lee JW, Kim YM. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002a; Seoul: Dusan; 64-69.
24. Lee SS, Yun MS, Coh IK, Kim HK, Pak YK, Choi GH, Song YK, Min CK. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002b; Seoul: Chunjaegyoyuk; 75-82.
25. Lee TW, Kim HJ, Chai GH, Lee HJ, Kim JS, Chung MH, Hong SH. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002c; Seoul: Hongjin P&M; 70-72.
26. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007 National health statistics. National health and nutrition survey IV, 1st year [2007]. 2007.
27. Ministry of Health & Welfare, The Korean Nutrition Society, Korea Food & Drug Administration. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans. 2010; First revision. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society; 524-544. 592. 603-616.
28. Oh SY. Analysis of methods on dietary quality assessment. Korean J Community Nutr. 2000; 5(25): 362-367.
29. Park MY, Park EJ, Chung YJ. Evaluation of diet quality of Korean adolescents based on nutrient and food and food group intake. Chungnam J Hum Ecol. 2005; 18(1): 95-110.
30. Song HG, Lee YI, Ryeu CS, Kim MS, Lee HG. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002; Seoul: Daehangyokwaseo; 63-67.
31. The Korean Institute of Demographic & Social Affairs. Recommended dietary allowances for Koreans. 1989; fifth Revision. Seoul: Komunsa; 13.
32. The Korean Nutrition Society. Recommended dietary allowances for Koreans. 2001; 7th Revision, 2000. Seoul: Juang-AngMunHwaSa.
33. The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Korean. 2005; i-vi. 331-335.
34. The Korean Nutrition Society. Food composition table (CD) in dietary reference intakes for Korean. 2005.
35. Yeoh YJ, Yoon J, Shim JE. Relation of breakfast intake to diet quality in Korean school-aged children: analysis of the data from the 2001 National health and nutrition survey. Korean J Community Nutr. 2009; 14(1): 1-11.
36. You CR, Kim ET, Ahn JH, Gi YI, Sung HK, Oh MS, Lee SH, Lee YS, Chung OB, Coh JS. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002; Seoul: Dongwhasa; 14-18.
37. Yoon IK, Kwak SM, Chung CY, Choi YH, Song IM, Lee MS, Park SY. Middle school technology·home economics. 2002; Seoul: Gyohakyeongusa; 69-73.

Table 1

Suggested serving of each food group in the target pattern of 1,900kcal and 2,000kcal for woman1)

1) Fat, nuts and sugar group(4 servings) is excluded in menu planning because of substitution in the process of cooking(Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2010)

Table 2

General characteristics of the teachers participated 81 (100.0)

Table 3

Knowledge on the concepts related to the menu planning

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = don't know at all ~ 5 = know very well

^***: p < 0.001

Table 4

Easy to teach, easy to learn and benefit to daily life of menu planning by target pattern

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = not at all ~ 5 = very much so

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 5

Practice of menu planning in the past & present, and intention of menu planning in the future

1) N (%)

Table 6

Energy content of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern and the percent difference of energy content to references

Mean ± SD = 2,104 ± 185 kcal (teacher); 2,293 ± 245l kcal (student)

Range: 1,549~2,454 kcal (teacher); 1,738~3,098 kcal (student)

Table 7

Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of carbohydrate and protein contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2005, 2) Mean ± SD, 3) N (%)

Table 8

Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of fat contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Mean ± SD

Table 9

The NAR of protein, mineral and vitamin in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%), 2) Non applicable, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 10

The MAR of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001

Table 11

The DVS of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%)

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Nutritional Adequacy Analysis of Recommended Menu in Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2015
Youngnam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2017; 22(4): 279. CrossRef
Proposition and Application of a Dish-Based Target Pattern for Korean Adolescent Girls
Mi Jin Park, Youngnam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2015; 20(2): 87. CrossRef
Revision of the Target Pattern based on Single Serving Size of Dishes for Korean Adolescent Meal Plan
Mi Jin Park, Youngnam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2015; 20(1): 21. CrossRef
Revision and Application of the Target Pattern in Food Guidance System: Administered to 2nd grade middle school students
Ha Yeon Lee, Youngnam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2014; 19(3): 274. CrossRef
Assessment of Menu Plan Prepared by Middle School Students According to Ordinary Meal Pattern and Single Serving Size
Jung-Ok Kim, Youngnam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2013; 18(4): 333. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Center for Child-Care Foodservice Management for Menu Management and Dietary Variety
Hye-Young Kim, Il-Sun Yang, In-Sook Chae, Bo-Sook Yi, Moon-Kyung Park, Ha-Young Kim, Tae-Seok Kang, Dong-Gil Leem, Jin-Ha Lee, Hae-Young Lee
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2013; 18(3): 243. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Nutritional Assessment of Menu Plan Prepared according to the Target Pattern: Menu Prepared by Home Economics Teachers and Middle-School Girls

Korean J Community Nutr. 2011;16(3):375-385. Published online June 30, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2011.16.3.375

XML Download

We recommend

Nutritional Assessment of Menu Plan Prepared according to the Target Pattern: Menu Prepared by Home Economics Teachers and Middle-School Girls

Table 1

Suggested serving of each food group in the target pattern of 1,900kcal and 2,000kcal for woman1)

1) Fat, nuts and sugar group(4 servings) is excluded in menu planning because of substitution in the process of cooking(Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2010)

Table 2

General characteristics of the teachers participated 81 (100.0)

Table 3

Knowledge on the concepts related to the menu planning

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = don't know at all ~ 5 = know very well

^***: p < 0.001

Table 4

Easy to teach, easy to learn and benefit to daily life of menu planning by target pattern

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = not at all ~ 5 = very much so

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 5

Practice of menu planning in the past & present, and intention of menu planning in the future

1) N (%)

Table 6

Energy content of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern and the percent difference of energy content to references

Mean ± SD = 2,104 ± 185 kcal (teacher); 2,293 ± 245l kcal (student)

Range: 1,549~2,454 kcal (teacher); 1,738~3,098 kcal (student)

Table 7

Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of carbohydrate and protein contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2005, 2) Mean ± SD, 3) N (%)

Table 8

Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of fat contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Mean ± SD

Table 9

The NAR of protein, mineral and vitamin in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%), 2) Non applicable, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 10

The MAR of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%)

^***: p < 0.001

Table 11

The DVS of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) N (%)

Table 1 Suggested serving of each food group in the target pattern of 1,900kcal and 2,000kcal for woman1)

1) Fat, nuts and sugar group(4 servings) is excluded in menu planning because of substitution in the process of cooking(Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2010)

Table 2 General characteristics of the teachers participated 81 (100.0)

Table 3 Knowledge on the concepts related to the menu planning

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = don't know at all ~ 5 = know very well

^***: p < 0.001

Table 4 Easy to teach, easy to learn and benefit to daily life of menu planning by target pattern

1) The 10 teachers were excluded whom no experience on teaching of manu planning and target pattern

1 = not at all ~ 5 = very much so

^**: p < 0.01, ^***: p < 0.001

Table 5 Practice of menu planning in the past & present, and intention of menu planning in the future

1) N (%)

Table 6 Energy content of the menu plan prepared by the target pattern and the percent difference of energy content to references

Mean ± SD = 2,104 ± 185 kcal (teacher); 2,293 ± 245l kcal (student)

Range: 1,549~2,454 kcal (teacher); 1,738~3,098 kcal (student)

Table 7 Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of carbohydrate and protein contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, 2005, 2) Mean ± SD, 3) N (%)

Table 8 Energy contribution ratio and adequacy evaluation of fat contribution to energy in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern

1) Mean ± SD

Table 9 The NAR of protein, mineral and vitamin in the menu plan prepared by the target pattern