Bo Ram Han; Hyun Sook Bae

doi:10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.2.156

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Korean J Community Nutr > Volume 17(2); 2012 > Article

Original Article
Development and Evaluation of the Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Folate Intake in Women of Child-bearing Age: Bo Ram Han, Hyun Sook Bae; Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2012;17(2):156-166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.2.156
Published online: April 30, 2012

Department of Food & Nutrition, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

¹Graduate School of Cultural Industry, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Hyun Sook Bae, Graduate School of Cultural Industry, Sungshin Women's University, 147 Mia-dong, Gangbuk-gu, Seoul 142-732, Korea. Tel: (02) 920-7558, Fax: (02) 920-2076, hsbae@sungshin.ac.kr

• Received: January 4, 2012 • Revised: March 14, 2012 • Accepted: March 28, 2012

402 Views
0 Download
3 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
REFERENCES

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the simple semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for assessing folate intake in women of reproductive age. We developed a 30-item FFQ, and tested the reliability and validity in 97 women aged between 20 and 39 yrs using the FFQs and 24-h recalls, which were carried out twice, respectively. Assessing the reliability, the correlation coefficients were 0.53 (Spearman's) and 0.49 (Pearson's) for folate. There was no significant difference of folate intake between FFQ1 and FFQ2. 36.1% subjects were classified into the same quartile and 83.5% into the same or adjacent quartile divided by folate intake. On determining the validity, the mean folate intake obtained from the FFQ (FFQ1) and 24h-recalls (2-d) were 306.6 ± 167.2 µg/d and 326.9 ± 103.3 µg/d, respectively. There was no significant difference between folate intakes from the two methods. The correlation coefficients for folate were 0.24 (Spearman's) and 0.26 (Pearson's). 39.2% of the subjects were categorized into the same quartile and 70.1% were into the same or adjacent quartile. In addition, sensitivity (64.3%) and specificity (62.3%) were estimated to evaluate the adequacy of folate intake. These results suggest that this FFQ would be a useful and a valuable instrument to assess the intake of folate among the Korean women of child-bearing age.
Keywords: folate; FFQ; reliability; validity; child-bearing women

REFERENCES

1. Ahn KH, Yoo CJ, Kim YC. Product differentiation strategy of DONGWON F&B through brand management. Korean J Mark. 2007; 9(3): 167-185.
2. Ahn HS, Jeong EY, Kim SY. Studies on plasma homocysteine concentration and nutritional status of vitamin B₆, B₁₂ and folate in college women. Korean J Nutr. 2002; 35(1): 37-44.
3. Ahn YJ, Lee JE, Cho NH, Shin C, Park C, Oh BS, Kim KC. Validation and calibration of semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire-with participants of the Korean health and genome study-. Korean J Community Nutr. 2004; 9(2): 173-182.
4. Bae HS, Cho YH, Kim JY, Ahn HS. Comparison of nutrient intake and antioxidant status in female college students by skin types. Korean J Community Nutr. 2006; 11(1): 63-71.
5. Bae HS, Choi SI, Ahn HS. Nutritional and antioxidant status by skin types among female adults. Nutr Res Pract. 2010a; 4(3): 215-221.Article PubMed
6. Bae HS, Kim SY, Ahn HS, Cho YK. Comparison of nutrient intake, life style variables, and pregnancy outcomes by the depression degree of pregnant women. Nutr Res Pract. 2010b; 4(4): 323-331.Article PubMed
7. Baer HJ, Blum RE, Rockett HR, Leppert J, Gardner JD, Suitor CW, Colditz GA. Use of a food frequency questionnaire in American Indian and Caucasian pregnant women: a validation study. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5: 135-145.Article PubMed PMC PDF
8. Bang SW, Lee SS. The factors affecting pregnancy outcomes in the second trimester pregnant women. Nutr Res Pract. 2009; 3(2): 134-140.Article PubMed PMC
9. Boucher B, Cotterchio M, Kreiger N, Nadalin V, Block T, Block G. Validity and reliability of the Block98 food-frequency questionnaire in a sample of Canadian women. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(1): 84-93.Article PubMed
10. Brown JE, Isaacs JS, Krinke UB, Murtaugh MA, Sharbaugh C, Stang J, Wooldridge NH. Nutrition through the life cycle. 2008; third edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth; 53-54.
11. Canfield MA, Collins JS, Botto LD, Williams LJ, Mai CT, Kirby RS, Pearson K, Devine O, Mulinare J. National Birth Defects Preventin Network. Changes in the birth prevalence of selected birth defects after grain fortification with folic acid in the United States: findings from a multi-state population-based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005; 73(10): 679-689.PubMed
12. Clover E, Miller M, Bannernan E, Magarey A. Relative validation of a short food frequency questionnaire to assess calcium intake in older adults. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007; 31(5): 450-458.Article PubMed PDF
13. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. 1990; New York: Oxford University Press; 11.
14. Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Brants HAM, van't Verr P, AL M, Stunnans F, Hermus RJJ. Validation of a dietary questionnaire used in a large-scale prospective cohort study on diet and cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994; 48: 253-265.PubMed
15. Green NS. Folic acid supplementation and prevention of birth defects. J Nutr. 2002; 132: 2356S-2360S.Article PubMed
16. Grosse SD, Collins JS. Folic acid supplementation and neural tube defect recurrence prevention. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007; 79(11): 737-742.Article PubMed
17. Heu MS, Kim HJ, Yoon MS, Park KH, Shin JH, Lee TG, Kim JG, Kim JS. DHA enrichment of salmon patty using emulsion curd and its component characteristics. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2010; 43(4): 285-292.Article
18. Hyun TS, Han YH. Comparison of folate intake and food sources in college students using the 6^th vs 7^thnutrient data base. Korean J Nutr. 2001; 34(7): 797-808.
19. Ji SK, Kim HS, Choi HM. A study on development and validation of food frequency questionnaire for estimating energy intake of women in child-bearing age. Korean J Nutr. 2008; 13(1): 111-124.
20. Jin HO, Lim HS. Major foods for folate and their folate contents of Korean child-bearing women. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2001; 30(1): 152-158.
21. Jung SW, Lee NJ, Lee KG, Hong KW, Lee SJ. Changes in microbiological contamination in tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) of various thawing temperature. Food Engineering Progress. 2006; 10(3): 186-191.Article PDF
22. Khan NC, Mai LB, Hien VT, Lam NT, Hoa VQ, Phuong TM, Nhung BT, Nakamori M, Shimizu Y, Yamamoto S. Development and validation of food frequency questionnaire to assess calcium intake in postmenopausal Vietnamese women. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2008; 54: 124-129.Article PubMed
23. Kim EJ, Cha BK. Weight control behaviors in female college students. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2007; 13(4): 320-326.Article PDF
24. Kim HC, Kim MR. Analysis on awareness and practices for diet according to lifestyles of college students. Korean J Hum Ecol. 2010; 19(1): 157-165.Article
25. Kim MK, Lee SS, Ahn YO. Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among middle-aged men in Seoul. Korean J Community Nutr. 1996; 1(3): 376-394.
26. Usage of meat classified by parts. Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation. 2011; cited 2011 August 17. Avaliable from http://www.ekape.or.kr/view/user/information/eat_01.part_01.cow_cow_01.asp.
27. Korean Dietetic Association. Seeing pictures of food weight estimated by eye. 1999; Seoul: KDA.
28. Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans. 2010; The Korean Nutrition Society; 607.
29. Lee SY. Assessment of dietary intake and diet quality obtained by 24-hour recall method in Korean adults living in rural area. 1997; Seoul National University; Dissertation.
30. Lim HS, Jin HO, Lee JA. Dietary intakes and status of folate in Korean women of child-bearing potential. Korean J Nutr. 2000; 33(3): 296-303.
31. Lim JY, Rha HB. Weight control and associated factors among health-related major female college students in Seoul. Korean J Community Nutr. 2007; 12(3): 247-258.
32. Lincetto O. Prevention of neural tube defects. Department of Making Pregnancy Safer, World Health Organization. 2007; cited 2011 Novemver 15. Available from www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/neural_tube_defects.pdf.
33. Mikkelsen TB, Osler M, Oslen SF. Validity of protein, retinol, folic acid and n-3 fatty acid intakes estimated from the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(6): 771-778.PubMed
34. Mouratidou T, Ford F, Fraser RB. Validation of a food frequency-questionnaire for use in pregnancy. Public Health Nutr. 2006a; 9: 515-522.PubMed
35. Mouratidou T, Ford F, Prountzou F, Fraser R. Dietary assessment of a population of pregnant women in Sheffield, UK. Br J Nutr. 2006b; 96(5): 929-935.PubMed
36. Noia JD, Contento IR. Use of a brief food frequency questionnaire for estimating daily number of servings of fruits and vegetables in a minority adolescent population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: 1785-1789.PubMed PMC
37. Park JW, Park HM, Ha NS. A study on the obesity and weight control methods of college students. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004; 13(1): 5-13.
38. Park KY, Yoon MS, Kim JG, Kim HJ, Shin JH, Lee JS, No YI, Heu MS, Kim JS. Preparation and characterization of canned salmon frame. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2010; 43(2): 93-99.
39. Son SM, Huh GY, Lee HS. Development and evaluation of validity of dish frequency questionnaire (DFQ) and short DFQ using Na index for estimation of habitual sodium intake. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005; 10(5): 677-692.
40. Swierk M, Williams PG, Wilcox J, Russell KG, Meyer Bj. Validation of an Australian electronic food frequency questionnaire to measure polyunsaturated fatty acid intake. Nutrition. 2011; 27(6): 641-646.PubMed
41. Vriese SR, Henauw S, Dhont M, Christophe AB. Estimation of dietary fat intake of Belgian pregnant women. Ann Nutr Metab. 2001; 45: 273-278.PubMed
42. Wardle J, Haase AM. Steptoe a body image and weight control in young adults: international comparisons in university students from 22 countries. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006; 30: 644-651.PubMed
43. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. 1998; 2nd Ed. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
44. Xia W, Sun C, Zhang L, Zhang X, Wang J, Wang H, Wu L. Reproducibility and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire developed for female adolescents in Suihua, North China. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(5): e19656.PubMed PMC
45. Xu L, Dibley MJ, D'Este C. Reliability and validity of a food-frequency questionnaire for Chinese postmenopausal women. Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7(1): 91-98.PubMed
46. Yim KS, Lee TY, Park HS. The development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Korean adolescents. Korean J Community Nutr. 2003; 8(2): 149-159.
47. Yon MY, Hyun TS. Additional data for the folate database for foods common in Korea. Korean J Nutr. 2005; 38(7): 586-604.

Table 1

Food items, reference amount and frequency of folate FFQ¹⁾ used in this study

1) FFQ: Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Subjects chose one among these 9 frequencies at each food item, respectively

Table 2

Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ1 and FFQ2¹⁾

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) NS (Not Significant), ^*: p < 0.05

3) Mean ± SD

Table 3

Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ1 and FFQ2¹⁾

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 4

Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and FFQ2 according to folate intake

FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 5

Percent of subjects classified into the same and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 6

Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ1¹⁾ and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Mean ± SD

3) NS: Not Significant, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 7

Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ1¹⁾ and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 8

Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1¹⁾ and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 9

Percent of subjects classified into the lowest/highest and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

Table 10

Distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake converted to NAR

1) N (%)

NAR: Nutrient Adequacy Ratio

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Development and application of the sodium index to estimate and assess sodium intake for Korean adults
Yeon-Kyung Lee, Taisun Hyun, Heekyong Ro, Young-Ran Heo, Mi-Kyeong Choi
Nutrition Research and Practice.2022; 16(3): 366. CrossRef
Dietary Habits and Nutritional Status of Young Women according to Breakfast Frequency in Seoul
Da-Mee Kim, Youl-Ri Kim, Kyung-Hee Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2018; 23(2): 102. CrossRef
Development of a Questionnaire for Dietary Habit Survey of Korean Adults
Jin Suk Jo, Ki Nam Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2014; 19(3): 258. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Development and Evaluation of the Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Folate Intake in Women of Child-bearing Age

Korean J Community Nutr. 2012;17(2):156-166. Published online April 30, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.2.156

XML Download

We recommend

Development and Evaluation of the Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Folate Intake in Women of Child-bearing Age

Table 1

Food items, reference amount and frequency of folate FFQ¹⁾ used in this study

1) FFQ: Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Subjects chose one among these 9 frequencies at each food item, respectively

Table 2

Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ1 and FFQ2¹⁾

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) NS (Not Significant), ^*: p < 0.05

3) Mean ± SD

Table 3

Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ1 and FFQ2¹⁾

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 4

Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and FFQ2 according to folate intake

FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 5

Percent of subjects classified into the same and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 6

Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ1¹⁾ and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Mean ± SD

3) NS: Not Significant, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 7

Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ1¹⁾ and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 8

Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1¹⁾ and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 9

Percent of subjects classified into the lowest/highest and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

Table 10

Distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake converted to NAR

1) N (%)

NAR: Nutrient Adequacy Ratio

Table 1 Food items, reference amount and frequency of folate FFQ1) used in this study

1) FFQ: Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Subjects chose one among these 9 frequencies at each food item, respectively

Table 2 Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ1 and FFQ21)

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) NS (Not Significant), ^*: p < 0.05

3) Mean ± SD

Table 3 Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ1 and FFQ21)

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 4 Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and FFQ2 according to folate intake

FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 5 Percent of subjects classified into the same and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) FFQ2: second Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 6 Comparison of daily nutrient intake between FFQ11) and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

2) Mean ± SD

3) NS: Not Significant, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 7 Correlation coefficients between nutrients estimated by FFQ11) and 24-h recall methods

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

^*: p < 0.05, ^**: p < 0.01, ^***: P < 0.001

Table 8 Quartile distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ11) and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake

1) FFQ1: first Food Frequency Questionnaire

Table 9 Percent of subjects classified into the lowest/highest and upto adjacent quartiles of folate intake

Table 10 Distribution of subjects by cross-classification of FFQ1 and 24h-recall methods according to folate intake converted to NAR